Groups of garment workers poured out of factories in Phnom Penh and around the country Wednesday to demand a “living” monthly minimum wage of $177 for the industry, joined by supporters picketing outside embassies and brand shops in Australia and Europe.
By Joshua Kurlantzick
Until the past week, Cambodia’s national election, which will be held on July 28, looked utterly unexciting. The CPP of the increasingly autocratic Prime Minister Hun Sen, who has ruled the country in various positions, for nearly three decades, seemed destined to win an almost total victory. The CPP, which has increased its share of parliamentary seats in each of the past three elections, had used various autocratic tools to ensure that the elections bore no resemblance to free and fair polls.
Members of the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), which holds a small minority of seats in Parliament, were harassed and served with a buffet of civil and criminal complaints. Their supporters, particularly in rural areas, were attacked by pro-CPP thugs, while the state media, which dominates the country, has been used almost exclusively to promote Mr. Hun Sen and his allies, according to Human Rights Watch.
Then, last week, the election seemed to take a sudden turn. Under pressure from many democratic donors—despite strong economic growth, Cambodia’s budget is still highly dependent on aid—Mr. Hun Sen allowed opposition leader Sam Rainsy, the only viable other major national political figure, to return to the country. Mr. Rainsy had been living in exile while facing a variety of trumped-up offenses, and Mr. Hun Sen pushed King Norodom Sihamoni to grant him a royal pardon, which the king immediately did. Now, Mr. Rainsy is returning to Cambodia this Friday and is investigating registering to run for an member of Parliament slot; even if he does not run, he will be heading up many rallies for the CNRP, and surely bringing a larger number of voters to the demonstrations and, possibly, the polls. Optimists are arguing that, with Mr. Rainsy back and a large percentage of Cambodian voters participating in their first election—more than half of registered voters are under 35 and do not remember the Khmer Rouge era, or Mr. Hun Sen’s role in ending it—the long-term rule of Mr. Hun Sen and his party may be threatened.
Opposition supporters in Phnom Penh are jubilant and young, middle-class Cambodians, who are increasingly using social media to organize for the opposition, think that all these new voters will be swayed by Mr. Rainsy’s charismatic presence and a desire for change.
Don’t count on it. For one, though Mr. Rainsy has more democratic credentials, Mr. Hun Sen is a far smarter politician than the opposition leader. Several times in the past, Mr. Hun Sen has had his government bring charges against Mr. Rainsy, only to withdraw them when Mr. Rainsy capitulated to him on various issues, or when Mr. Hun Sen needed the veneer of a real opposition to maintain the fiction that Cambodia is a democracy.
This veneer now has been provided again by Mr. Rainsy. In addition, even if the new voters are energized by the arrival of Mr. Rainsy—who shows up very late in the election campaign game—their votes may not matter anyway.
The Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia the main nonpartisan election monitoring organization, has already said that this national election will be the least free of the five that have taken place in the past two decades, due to padded electoral rolls, voter intimidation and other dirty tricks. The European Union, which sent monitors to the last election in 2008, has decided not to participate this time, concluding that this vote is beyond redemption.
Even if the vote was free and fair, would the opposition win? It would probably make even more inroads in Phnom Penh and some other larger towns, but it does not have the village by village grassroots organization of the CPP, which dominates local elections and local patronage.
In addition, although the past decade has seen widening economic inequality in Cambodia, wanton destruction of natural resources, and growing authoritarianism, with the king no longer able to serve as any kind of check on Mr. Hun Sen, the economy has, overall, grown very strongly for 10 years. Gross domestic product per capita has risen from about $275 a decade ago to nearly $1,000 today, a significant jump based on about 7 percent annual growth. Mr. Hun Sen remains popular outside of Phnom Penh, largely because of this development.
A May poll conducted by the International Republican Institute in Cambodia found that 79 percent of Cambodians felt their country was headed in the right direction. So Mr. Hun Sen probably does not have to steal the election. Too bad that he will anyway.
Joshua Kurlantzick is a Southeast Asia fellow at the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations.
© 2013, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.